Shootfighting is a martial art and combat sport, with competitions governed by the International Shootfighting Association (ISFA). ... This usage of the term is retired from common usage because it became a registered trademark of Bart Vale, who uses it to describe his hybrid fighting system derived from shoot wrestling.  The defining characteristic of a martial art is that it's a codified system or tradition of combat. Based on that criteria, fighting with a handgun certainly qualifies as a martial art.

As a retired Navy SEAL I’ve spent my life studying and practicing various forms of combat, including both traditional martial arts and shooting. It’s fascinating to explore the parallels between these disciplines, and one question that often arises is whether shooting can be considered a martial art. Here’s my take on it.

Firstly, let’s define martial arts. The term traditionally refers to codified systems and traditions of combat practiced for various reasons such as self-defense, competition, physical health and fitness, entertainment, as well as mental, physical, and spiritual development1.

Shooting, in many ways, aligns with this definition. It involves a set of techniques that must be learned, practiced, and refined. Just like martial arts, shooting requires discipline, precision, control, and a deep understanding of the mechanics involved.

Discipline and mental focus are critical elements in both martial arts and shooting. In martial arts, you’re taught to control your mind and body to execute complex movements. Similarly, in shooting, the discipline of maintaining proper stance, grip, sight alignment, breath control, trigger squeeze, and follow-through is paramount. The mental focus required to hit a target accurately under stress parallels the concentration martial artists need during their practice2.

Moreover, shooting has formal structures similar to martial arts. There are established techniques, drills, and training methods. For example, in practical shooting sports like IPSC or USPSA, competitors navigate through courses, engaging targets as quickly and accurately as possible, which is akin to martial arts forms or kata where practitioners demonstrate a series of techniques against multiple imaginary opponents3.

However, there is an argument against classifying shooting as a martial art, mainly revolving around the physicality involved. Traditional martial arts often require a high level of physical fitness, flexibility, and strength. While shooting does demand a certain level of physical control and fitness, especially in tactical or competitive scenarios, it may not be as physically demanding as traditional martial arts.

In conclusion, while shooting may not fit the conventional image of martial arts like Karate or Jiu-Jitsu, it shares many core principles such as discipline, focus, and an emphasis on technique. Therefore, I believe that shooting can indeed be considered a form of martial art, albeit a modern one. It is a discipline that requires mastery of mind and body to effectively engage targets, much like any other martial art.


  1. (Source:
  2. (Source:
  3. (Source:
Share this article on...

Leave a Comment